Your agency has been using Frase for two years. The SEO content workflow is dialed in—SERP analysis, competitive outlines, optimization scoring, FAQ schema generation. It works. Content moves up in Google. Clients are happy with the ranking reports.
Then one day a client's CMO lands on the desk with a different question: "Are we showing up in ChatGPT?"
You run a quick manual check. Your client's best-performing pillar page—the one ranking #1 in Google, the one with a green Frase score, the one with perfect FAQ schema—doesn't appear in ChatGPT when you ask the exact query it owns.
This gap is real, and it's growing. Per Conductor's 2026 State of AEO/GEO Report, 94% of CMOs plan to increase AEO investment in 2026. Per Ahrefs' December 2025 analysis, AI Overviews now trigger on 48% of tracked queries, and position-1 organic CTR drops 58% when they appear. AI engines operate on entirely separate citation logic from Google rankings.
Frase is an excellent SEO content tool. But the question on the CMO's desk is no longer just "Can we rank?" It's "Can we be recommended?" That's a different job, and it requires different tooling. This comparison lays out what each tool does, where they diverge, and which agencies should be keeping Frase, adding GenPicked, or running both.
Start your 14-day free trial
Growth plan free for 14 days. Five AI engines. Full agency dashboard.
Start free trialThe AEO investment wave is real
Three industry data points should sit on your desk this quarter:
First, 56% of CMOs made significant AEO investments in 2025, and 94% plan to increase spend in 2026 (Conductor State of AEO/GEO Report). The key word is "increase"—not "allocate for the first time," but "increase." This means AEO is already a line item for most brands. The question is not whether to do it, but how to do it better and measure it harder.
Second, AI Overviews are no longer a novelty. Per Ahrefs' December 2025 analysis, AI Overviews trigger on 48% of queries, up from 31% a year ago. And when they appear, position-1 organic CTR drops 58%—a massive hit. But here's the flip side: per Seer Interactive's September 2025 analysis, being cited in an AI Overview is worth 35% more organic clicks and 91% more paid clicks than not being cited. You can't ignore AI Overviews anymore. They're the new traffic arbiter.
Third, only 12% of agencies track brand citations across all 5 major AI engines; 88% rely on spotchecking (Stackmatix 2026 agency survey). This is where the competitive gap lives. The agencies measuring AEO daily are leaving the ones who check once a month completely behind in client conversations.
What Frase actually does well
Frase is category leader for a reason. The platform excels at one core job: analyzing Google search results for a target keyword and producing a structured content brief that tells writers exactly what to cover to compete with the ranking pages.
Content brief generation: Frase runs a SERP analysis, extracts key concepts and entities from the top competitors, builds an auto-outline, and serves an optimization score. The output is actionable—writers get a rubric. Per Frase's 2026 pricing page, all plans include this starting at $39–49/month Starter tier.
FAQ schema generator: Frase auto-generates FAQ blocks and structures them into FAQPage JSON-LD schema. This is real value for AEO. Per Frase's research, pages with FAQ schema are 3.2× more likely to appear in Google AI Overviews. No argument there—this is documented and replicable.
AI Visibility tracking (across 8 engines): Frase can show you whether your brand is mentioned on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot, Grok, and DeepSeek. This is a real feature. The granularity is brand-mention-only (Does ChatGPT mention us? Yes/No), but it works. All plans include this starting at $39–49/month.
API integrations: Frase connects to WordPress, HubSpot, Zapier, and other platforms. Workflow integration is solid for agencies managing multi-step content pipelines.
Pricing tiers (2026): Starter $39–49/mo, Growth $79–99/mo, Team $129–159/mo. Annual pricing available with roughly 20% discount. All tiers include content briefs, FAQ generation, and AI Visibility tracking.
What Frase is not built to do: AEO measurement
Frase shows WHETHER you're cited by AI engines. It does not show when your citations change, which engines cite you most, whether you're losing ground to competitors, or how to report these findings to clients with your logo on the report.
This distinction matters. Per Stackmatix's 2026 agency survey, only 12% of agencies track brand citations across all 5 major AI engines; 88% rely on spotchecking. The difference between Frase and an AEO platform is that Frase shows you the snapshot; an AEO platform alerts you when the snapshot changes.
What Frase's AI Visibility tracker does:
- Shows whether a brand is mentioned on a platform
- Tracks 8 AI engines (comprehensive)
- Integrates with content optimization workflow
What Frase's AI Visibility tracker does NOT do:
- Alert when you lose a citation on a query you own
- Break out per-engine ACS subscores (shows all-engines-combined only)
- Generate white-label PDF reports with agency branding
- Manage 5+ client brands in one dashboard
- Track sentiment changes (is the AI saying positive things about us?)
- Monitor competitor emergence/loss with alerts
That list of "does nots" is not a criticism of Frase. It's scope. Frase is solving the SEO content optimization problem. The AEO measurement problem is a different tool entirely.
The feature comparison: Frase vs GenPicked
Frase is best-in-class for SEO content prep. GenPicked is built for AEO measurement, alerts, and multi-brand reporting. The feature gaps aren't weaknesses in Frase—they're different products solving different jobs. Most agencies don't rip-and-replace. They keep Frase for content briefs and add GenPicked for AEO measurement.
Why the tooling mismatch costs agencies retainers
The problem shows up in month three of the AEO retainer. The CMO asks for a monthly report. You screenshot ChatGPT, ask a few questions, compile the results into a PDF. It's messy and manual. By month six, you're three days of work into monthly reporting that you're charging $1,500/month to provide. The math breaks.
The tooling gap also shows up in crisis moments. Your client's top competitor just appeared in ChatGPT for a query they own. You don't find out until the CMO does—two weeks after it happened. Now you're explaining why you didn't catch it. With Frase alone, you have no alert system. You're checking manually. An AEO platform with daily sweeps and alerts catches the loss within 24 hours. You can react instead of react-with-embarrassment.
Third, per-engine visibility matters more than agencies realize. Claude mentions brands in 97.3% of answers. ChatGPT mentions brands in 73.6% (per Profound's public data). That 23.7-point spread is massive. If your monitoring tool averages across engines and tells you "visibility is 85%," you're missing that Claude (your best engine) is strong while ChatGPT (your biggest traffic source) is weak. You need per-engine reporting to decide where to invest optimization effort. Frase doesn't break this out; GenPicked does.
Four agency questions to decide your stack
If you're an agency owner weighing whether to keep Frase, add GenPicked, or both, answer these questions in order:
The complementary tools framing: Frase + GenPicked
The honest market data: most mid-market agencies run both tools, not one or the other.
Per Conductor's 2026 State of AEO/GEO Report, 56% of CMOs made significant AEO investments in 2025; 94% plan to increase in 2026. The phrase is "in addition to SEO," not "instead of SEO." The stack looks like this:
- Frase: Content briefs, SERP analysis, FAQ generation, Google-rank optimization
- GenPicked: Daily AEO citation tracking, alerts, per-engine scoring, white-label reporting, multi-brand dashboard
Typical agency spend (5 brands):
- Frase Growth: $99/mo
- GenPicked Growth platform: $197/mo
- GenPicked per-brand Lite tier × 5: $375/mo (5 × $75)
- Total: $671/month
For that $671/month, the agency gets: a 5-brand SEO content pipeline with Frase briefs, daily AEO citation tracking across 5 engines per brand, per-engine ACS scores with alerts for lost citations, white-label PDF monthly reports to send to clients, and a multi-brand portfolio view in one dashboard. Clients paying $5,000+/month for AEO retainers see positive ROI. Per ALM Corp's research, agencies with white-label reporting see 18% higher client retention and 23% higher retainer upsell rates.
Run a 14-day pilot on one client. Week 1: use both Frase and GenPicked on the same brand. Week 2: compile the data into a white-label report. Show it to the client at the end of month. That conversation will tell you whether the combined stack pays for itself on retainer.
FAQs
Start your 14-day free trial
Growth plan free for 14 days. Five AI engines. Full agency dashboard.
Start free trial